2 minute read
What It Is
In recent years, companies across the U.S. have rolled out aggressive diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. While designed to promote fairness and representation, these programs sometimes cross legal boundaries, leading to what is called “reverse discrimination”—where employees who are white, male, Christian, or otherwise seen as “non-diverse” allege they have been unfairly passed over for jobs or promotions. Lawsuits are now being filed by workers who allege they were denied promotions, raises, or even employment because they are white, male, straight, Christian, or otherwise seen as “non-diverse” [1] .
As detailed in a recent CNN report, several lawsuits currently before the U.S. Supreme Court challenge corporate DEI programs as unlawful. Plaintiffs argue that these initiatives amount to racial or gender discrimination in reverse—favoring “diverse” candidates at the expense of more qualified majority applicants. [2]
What the Trend or Practice Is
Employers may implement DEI goals that prioritize race, gender, or sexual orientation in hiring and advancement decisions. However, when these policies favor less-qualified candidates solely based on identity traits, they may violate federal anti-discrimination laws under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act [3]. Courts have increasingly scrutinized corporate policies that disadvantage workers from majority groups under the guise of “equity” [4]. The recent unanimous 9-0 Supreme Court decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services has removed extra hurdles for reverse discrimination cases [5]. The ruling requires the Court to apply the same requirements and burden of proof standards for all individuals alleging a discrimination lawsuit, regardless of their class status, making these reverse discrimination cases potentially easier to file [6] [7].
What the Signature Injury Is and How It’s Hurting People
Victims of reverse discrimination report [8]:
• Being passed over for promotions despite superior qualifications
• Retaliation after questioning race-based quotas
• Public shaming for expressing religious or political beliefs
• Demotions or terminations due to “non-inclusive” views
These actions can lead to financial loss, reputational damage, and long-term career setbacks.
Contact Us
If you are straight, white, male, Christian, or otherwise “non-diverse” and feel you were discriminated against or denied promotional opportunities at the workplace, legal options may be available. Contact the Michael Brady Lynch Firm at 888-585-5970 or email brandon@mblynchfirm.com for a free consultation.
Date: June 11, 2025
Attorney and Editor-In-Chief: Brandon Salter
Editors: Madison Hurley
Citations:
[1] https://www.americanbar.org/groups/business_law/resources/business-law-today/2024-december/legal-landscape-dei-one-year-after-harvard-unc-decision/
[2] https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/05/politics/supreme-court-reverse-discrimination-suits?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
[3] https://natlawreview.com/article/diversity-equity-and-inclusion-under-scrutiny-still-viable
[4] https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/05/politics/supreme-court-reverse-discrimination-suits?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
[5] https://www.americanbar.org/groups/business_law/resources/business-law-today/2024-december/legal-landscape-dei-one-year-after-harvard-unc-decision/
[6] https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/05/politics/supreme-court-reverse-discrimination-suits?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
[7] https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-court-reverse-discrimination-ames/
[8] https://www.reuters.com/business/world-at-work/us-supreme-court-revives-straight-womans-reverse-discrimination-case-2025-06-05/