Understanding Your Rights After Recent Allegations
Recent allegations involving a Barry University School of Law professor have raised serious concerns about student safety, privacy, and the integrity of the educational environment. While the case remains pending, the reported facts have left many students questioning whether the university took appropriate steps to protect them.
For students, this situation is not just news. It directly impacts their sense of security, academic experience, and trust in the institution.
The Michael Brady Lynch Firm is a Premier Litigation Firm
The Michael Brady Lynch Firm has handled over 500 sexual abuse cases nationwide, representing survivors in complex, high-stakes matters against institutions that failed to protect those in their care. With a track record of aggressively pursuing accountability and delivering results, the firm brings deep experience, strategic focus, and a survivor-centered approach to every case it takes on.
The Michael Brady Lynch Firm is actively and aggressively litigating this matter. What began as a single case has now developed into three viable cases, each presenting substantial claims and actively moving forward through the early stages of litigation. As additional facts continue to emerge, the scope of potential liability has expanded, reinforcing the seriousness of the allegations and the necessity of a firm legal response. Demand letters outline potential claims based on information gathered to date and place the university on formal notice of its alleged legal exposure.
Over the past several weeks, a thorough factual investigation has been conducted, focusing on what the university allegedly knew, when it knew it, and how it responded. Based on this investigation, multiple causes of action are being evaluated and prepared for litigation. These include potential claims under federal anti-discrimination laws, where students may have been subjected to unequal treatment or a hostile educational environment that interfered with their access to educational opportunities.
The firm remains committed to pursuing these claims with intensity and precision. As litigation progresses, the focus will remain on holding the institution accountable, amplifying the voices of those affected, and securing meaningful outcomes that reflect the seriousness of the alleged conduct.
interfered with their ability to participate in their education fully. There is also a growing focus on retaliation, particularly in situations where individuals who raised concerns or reported misconduct may have allegedly experienced adverse academic or professional consequences.
Potential Claims
Colleges and universities are subject to multiple federal and state laws that protect both students and employees from discrimination, retaliation, and institutional negligence. Depending on the facts, several legal claims may arise from the conduct at issue.
First, students may have claims under federal anti-discrimination laws where they are subjected to unequal treatment or a hostile educational environment. Where discriminatory conduct interferes with a student’s ability to access educational opportunities, institutions may be held accountable for failing to provide a safe and non-discriminatory environment.
Second, both students and employees may have retaliation claims. If an individual reports misconduct, discrimination, or safety concerns and is subsequently subjected to adverse treatment such as academic penalties, discipline, or employment consequences, that response may give rise to an independent claim for retaliation.
Third, employees of the university may have claims under federal employment discrimination laws, including Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. These claims may arise where an employee is subjected to discrimination based on a protected characteristic or where the workplace becomes hostile, and the university fails to take corrective action.
In addition to statutory claims, several negligence-based claims may apply under Florida law. A university may be liable for negligent hiring if it failed to conduct appropriate background checks or hired an individual it knew or should have known posed a risk. Similarly, negligent retention and negligent supervision claims may arise where the institution became aware of problematic conduct but failed to take reasonable steps to prevent further harm. In such cases, the university’s failure to act can form the basis of liability.
Each of these claims depends heavily on the specific facts, including what the university knew, when it knew it, and how it responded.
Injury Criteria
In order to pursue a viable legal claim, a student must demonstrate more than general concern or dissatisfaction. The law typically requires a showing of concrete harm affecting the student’s educational experience or well-being.
In this context, injury may include emotional distress such as anxiety, fear, or trauma resulting from the situation. Educational harm, such as disruption of coursework, diminished value of tuition, or the need to transfer or repeat classes, may also support a claim. Financial losses, including costs associated with counseling or additional schooling, may further establish damages.
Courts will also consider whether the university had notice of the underlying conduct and failed to take reasonable steps to address it. The existence of a hostile educational environment, particularly one that interferes with a student’s ability to participate fully in academic life, is a key factor in evaluating potential claims.
The Michael Brady Lynch Firm
If you are a current or former Barry University law student and believe you were harmed, exposed, or placed at risk by the university’s handling of this matter, you may have legal rights. The Michael Brady Lynch Firm is available to discuss potential claims involving negligent retention, Title IX, Title VII violations, or related misconduct.
Editor-In-Chief: Brandon Salter
Editor: Grant Gibson